AI is answering your buyers right now. This is your scoreboard.

Prompt sets run on a schedule across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Every response is scored — were you mentioned, were you cited, how were you framed — so AI visibility becomes a trend you manage, not an anecdote.

Run the free audit

Free · No credit card · Your plan in minutes

How it works

Prompt sets built from your market

The generator proposes the questions your buyers actually ask — comparisons, alternatives, problem-aware, branded — classified by type, steerable with plain-language guidance, and editable prompt by prompt.

Scored responses, not screenshots

Each engine’s response is captured and scored on a rubric: visibility, depth, framing, citations, competitive position. Mention rate and citation rate aggregate per round, so movement is measurable.

Competitors in the same frame

Tracked responses record every brand mentioned, so you see who AI recommends for your category today, which competitors keep surfacing, and whether your share of the answer is growing.

Connected to the agent that can act

The scoreboard lives next to an agent that ships fixes — answer-first content, structure, schema — behind approvals. Measurement and remediation are one loop, not two tools.

Buyers increasingly ask AI instead of searching. Whether you appear in those answers is now a marketing metric — and like any metric, it only improves once something measures it continuously.

What teams use it for

Common questions

Which engines are tracked?

ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Prompt sets run against each on your cadence, and per-engine scores make response-style differences visible instead of misleading.

What exactly gets scored?

Each response is scored on a rubric covering visibility, depth, framing, citation, and competitive position, plus flat mention and citation flags — aggregated into per-round and per-engine trends.

How do I know which prompts to track?

The generator analyzes your site and proposes up to 25 prompts across categories, with plain-language steering (e.g. “mostly unbranded prompts”) and per-prompt editing before anything runs.

Can it improve the scores, not just report them?

Yes — the same agent ships the remediation: answer-first pages, FAQ and schema coverage, structural fixes, all behind approvals. The tracking then shows whether the needle actually moved.

Works together with

See it on your own site first

The free audit grades your site and shows the plan Magister would execute — the fastest way to see what these capabilities do for you.

Run the free audit